Til norsk




 
Studio course  2011
Place and construction. Studio B3.  
Course code H10AS13 
Department Institute of Architecture 
Professor in charge Professor Per Olaf Fjeld  
Additional staff Associate Professor Lisbeth Funck,Professor Rolf Gerstlauer 
Prerequisities
Passed foundation level.
 
Instruction language Norwegian and English 
Max no. of students 36 
ECTS credits 24 

Course description

Studio B3. Autumn 2010/Spring 2011

Studio B3 ends its “Architecture as Infrastructure” discussion in the ongoing spring semester 2010. The material produced within the theme will be published as a sequel to the B3 Generator book.

Studio B3 will in the forthcoming semesters continue with its search towards an architectural awareness that seeks to establish sustainable relationships between Nature and Culture and where the experience, discoveries and inventive thinking from the Generator- and Infrastructure courses actively will be used and/or further developed.

The new relationship between nature and culture that Studio B3 in the next courses further investigates in, is utilized through the further understanding, development and discovery of architectures elementary properties and architectural space.

In order to approach this new correlation, the courses will at the start of the semester seek to dig deeper into the social/cultural changes and challenges that mark our time and discuss how these changes in different ways have influenced our relationship to the architectural space and how we use it.

Sets of living and the borderline between private and public as well as local and global will be debated in order to create a content in which the individual again compiles a consciousness towards architecture and hence also a clear attitude towards nature.

Title: The Discovery of a new Territory. In search for Place.

The new territory defines itself independent of earlier territorial borders or established definitions.

The new territory is understood as a place that states a clear relationship between content and context, and by so doing offers a deeper connection between nature and culture.

The territory as a whole can be regarded as a Spatial Infrastructure.

To find the architectural potential within the territory, an energy that is to be discovered and defined by you, will be the first challenge in the course before developing this potential into an architecture that inside the territory offers your desired relationship between nature and culture.

Themes: Local, Global, Contained in, To connect, To participate.

Territory investigation: Oslo, to be discussed. 

Studio B3. Autumn 2010/Spring 2011

Studio B3 ends its “Architecture as Infrastructure” discussion in the ongoing spring semester 2010. The material produced within the theme will be published as a sequel to the B3 Generator book.

 

Studio B3 will in the forthcoming semesters continue with its search towards an architectural awareness that seeks to establish sustainable relationships between Nature and Culture and where the experience, discoveries and inventive thinking from the Generator- and Infrastructure courses actively will be used and/or further developed.

 

The new relationship between nature and culture that Studio B3 in the next courses further investigates in, is utilized through the further understanding, development and discovery of architectures elementary properties and architectural space.

 

In order to approach this new correlation, the courses will at the start of the semester seek to dig deeper into the social/cultural changes and challenges that mark our time and discuss how these changes in different ways have influenced our relationship to the architectural space and how we use it.

 

Sets of living and the borderline between private and public as well as local and global will be debated in order to create a content in which the individual again compiles a consciousness towards architecture and hence also a clear attitude towards nature.

 

Title: The Discovery of a new Territory. In search for Place.

The new territory defines itself independent of earlier territorial borders or established definitions.

The new territory is understood as a place that states a clear relationship between content and context, and by so doing offers a deeper connection between nature and culture.

The territory as a whole can be regarded as a Spatial Infrastructure.

To find the architectural potential within the territory, an energy that is to be discovered and defined by you, will be the first challenge in the course before developing this potential into an architecture that inside the territory offers your desired relationship between nature and culture.

Themes: Local, Global, Contained in, To connect, To participate.

Territory investigation: Oslo, to be discussed.

Learning outcomes

At the end of the course, students will have increased their knowledge and skills within

  • Advanced, experimental architectural design.
  • Process preparation / adaptation.
  • Development of own working method.
  • Architectonic programming / development of a precise visual, written and verbal argumentation towards an architecture.
Contents and teaching methods

Intro design task; territories.

Individual design process / investigating the territories’ spatial properties and capacity.

Phase 1; introduction to the task – lectures and discussion.

Phase 2; to analyze a territory – models.

Phase 3; the discussion of place - text production.

Phase 4; further development of the project – drawings/models.

Phase 5; contextualization.

2D and 3D, photo/film, tool shop, testing hall.

Reviews: 2 common, 2 individual.

Study trip: USA

Exams and assessment methods

The course is assessed on the basis of participation, study-progression and three intermediate reviews. The final project is examined by an external critic. The work is to be used for publications.

The course is assessed as Pass/Fail, subject to the Regulations for Master's degree programs at AHO, § 6-14.

Literature

Recommended reading:  

Arata Isozaki: 1991-2000. (2000).

Beistegui, M. d. (2005). The New Heidegger. London: Continuum.

Benjamin, A. (Ed.). (2002). Blurred zones: investigations of the interstitial : Eisenman Architects 1988-1998. New York: Monacelli

Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: the logic of sensation. London: Continuum.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Athlone Press.

Eisenman, P. (2004). Eisenman inside out: selected writings, 1963-1988. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press.

Frampton, K. (2002). Labour, work and architecture: collected essays on architecture and design. London: Phaidon.

Gast, K.-P. (1998). Louis I. Kahn: the idea of order. Basel: Birkhäuser.

Gissen, D. (2009). Subnature: architecture's other environments. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Hays, K. M. (1998). Architecture theory since 1968. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

Hellman, L. (2000). Archi_têtes: the id in the grid. Chichester: Wiley-Academy.

Kwinter, S. (2001). Architectures of time: toward a theory of the event in modernist culture. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Leach, N., Turnbull, D., & Williams, C. (2004). Digital tectonics. Chichester: Wiley-Academy.

Lee, P. M. (2000). Object to be destroyed: the work of Gordon Matta-Clark. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Marcussen, L., Fugmann, Z., & Amundsen, M. (2006). Rummets arkitektur - arkitekturens rum. [København]: Arkitektens Forlag.

McGetrick, B., & Koolhaas, R. (Eds.). (2004). Content: triumph of realization. Köln: Taschen.

Mumford, L. (1972). The transformations of man. New York: Harper & Row.

Reeve, M. B., Eisenman, P., & Marvel, J. J. (Eds.). (1986). Investigations in architecture: Eisenman studios at the GSD, 1983-85. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Graduate School of Design.

Richter, G., & Friedel, H. (2006). Gerhard Richter: atlas. London: Thames & Hudson.

Spiller, N. (2002). Cyber_reader: critical writings for the digital era. London: Phaidon.

Spuybroek, L. (2004). NOX: machining architecture. London: Thames & Hudson.

Territory: architecture beyond environment. (2010). London:Wiley. (Architectural design, vol. 80, no. 3).

Thinking worlds: the Moscow conference on philosophy, politics, and art. (2007). Lukas & Sternberg.

Tschumi, B. (1994a). Architecture and disjunction. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Tschumi, B. (1994b). Event-cities: (praxis). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Tschumi, B. (2000). Event-cities 2. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Tschumi, B. (2004). Event-cities 3: concept vs. context vs. content. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Viola, B., & Violette, R. (1995). Reasons for knocking at an empty house: writings 1973-1994. Cambridge, Mass.: Anthony d'Offay gallery.

Weber, S., & Cholodenko, A. (1996). Mass mediauras: form, technics, media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Updated

20/05/2010